I am going to come out right now
and admit that I am a dork. Well, not so much a dork, but a complete college
football junkie.
Here’s an example. I was a fresh
21 year old college student. It was my first game ever being 21, and I could
finally have a “real” college tailgating experience if you know what I mean. I
chose not to. What did I do? I sat around and watched TCU upset Oklahoma 17-10 in Norman. I watched Iowa pounce all over Ball State 56-0.
Last September 3, AFTER the
afternoon games were over, then I went to tailgate. The only problem was that I
like to be in the stadium at least an hour before kickoff. That left me with
only about 20 minutes of tailgating.
If you don’t get what I’m saying
here it is in a nutshell. I, unlike most college students, have my priorities
very different. College football #1, tailgating #2, anything else in my way is
#3.
That’s why this past week was one
of my favorite times of the year. Preview magazines are FINALLY out. You know
what that means? That means from now until September, we can talk college
football and not feel stupid about it. It’s legit now.
My favorite magazines every year
are the Athlon Previews. Not only are they the most informative, but they are
beautiful to look at.
I picked up my new Athlon’s Big
Twelve Preview earlier this week and had half of it read by the end of the night
when my girlfriend and her sister were shopping for a dress at the mall. So I
got this idea to break down what I thought about this year’s issue. The
following is a piece I worked out stressing my frustrations with the issue, and
also what I like about it.
Here goes nothing.
Key
Cyclones
Athlons does this thing where they
break down the key players on each team heading into the season. For Iowa State they listed Bret Meyer, Todd Blythe,
DeAndre Jackson, Brent Curvey and Scott Stephenson. I agree with all of those.
Good job Athlons.
BUT, where is Stevie Hicks on that
list? Iowa
State only won ONE game
without Hicks in the lineup last season. One game! You can say that he dances
all you want, but you have to recognize that he was a huge part of that team
last season, and all indications to me say that he will be again. If Stevie
Hicks is healthy, Bret Meyer and Todd Blythe will strive. If he’s not, ISU could
be in for a long season. It’s that simple.
All Big 12
Projections
Athlons had Meyer, Blythe, Jackson
and Aaron Brandt listed as first team all-conference members. Curvey was listed
as a second team selection.
Meyer, Blythe and Jackson work for
me. Blythe was also mentioned as a projected 3rd team All-American.
Jackson is
questionable, not because of his ability but due to the help he will have in the
young secondary.
Here’s my big question. Where is
Scott Stephenson? He was 1st team All Big 12 last season, and this season you
don’t even mention him? Did Athlons forget about him? Are they worried about his
shoulder? What in the world is going on here? Last year Athlons had Stephenson
as the 3rd team starter before he had ever taken a snap at center at
college. He goes out and is all-conference, and then you snub him? How much
sense does this make to you people?
Brandt deserves to be mentioned,
but I don’t think he’s 1st team. I would put Brandt on the
2nd or 3rd team but 1st is a stretch.
Seriously though, Stephenson
wasn’t even mentioned. That’s some bulletin board material for the big guy right
there.
Kris Means
Athlons mentioned how Kris Means
might come right in and play. Have they been reading my stuff for the past six
months or what? Good call Athlons.
Position
Rankings
To me this is a tough thing to
rank. How do you look at it is the big question? If you’re going off of starters
alone then it’s no biggie, but if you look down the depth chart to some guys
with no experience, the job gets a lot tougher.
The big thing that stood out to me
is that Athlons had ISU ranked #1 when it came to QB’s in the Big 12. I really
want to say that I agree with this, but I can’t. I would put Oklahoma at number one at
I would put ISU at number two. That’s no disrespect to Bret Meyer and here’s
why.
For Meyer to have the best year
for a QB in the Big 12, so many things must go right. He absolutely has to have
a healthy productive offensive line. If he has that, then he has to have a
healthy productive running game. If both of those things happen, then Bret Meyer
will be the best QB in the Big 12. If one of those factors goes wrong, he won’t.
ISU’s running backs are ranked 9th in the Big 12. The OL is ranked
5th. Oklahoma’s running backs are ranked first and
the OL is ranked 6th. A running game is the most important thing in
the world for a QB to succeed, and Oklahoma almost has that guarantee with a
healthy Adrian Peterson. On top of that, OU’s depth at the o-line puts them
ahead of ISU. That’s where Rhett Bomar gets my nod.
ISU’s wide receivers are ranked
2nd in the Big 12 according to Athlons. Texas Tech is number one.
Personally I would switch the two around. Tech is always loaded at receiver and
once again, they are this season. Robert Johnson, Joel Filani and Jarrett Hicks
all combined for197 catches last fall. That’s an impressive number but the
reason they are ranked this high and the reason that they had so many catches is
simple. That’s all they do! That doesn’t mean they are the best. ISU will be
forced to throw a lot this year. With a healthy Jon Davis, these WR are by far
the best ever at ISU. Austin Flynn is automatic, Todd Blythe can do it all and
R.J. Sumrall is going to blow up. Toss in a young but huge Marquis Hamilton and
you have four guys who could potentially be number one receivers. Again, it all
comes down to the running game. If Hicks is healthy and plays well, everyone
else will strive.
Athlons has Iowa State’s DL ranked 6th in the
Big 12. If that’s true, then I feel a lot better heading into the season. I
don’t see how this line can be ranked so high after losing Nick Leaders and
Jason Berryman. Curvey will get double teamed every play and experience is
lacking. I think this line has the potential to be the 6th best, but
right now I would put them no higher that 9th.
Crucial
Games
This more than anything is the
category where I couldn’t disagree more with Athons. If you’re not familiar with
how Athlons does this, let me explain. They break each game down with three
categories. What they consider a: win, loss, or a crucial game. (meaning a
tweener)
Here’s what they had for
ISU
Toledo –
Crucial
UNLV – W
@Iowa –
L
@Texas
UNI – W
Nebraska – L
@Oklahoma –
L
Texas Tech –
L
@KSU – W
Kansas- Crucial
@Colorado – Crucial
Missouri –
Crucial
How is Nebraska not listed as a
crucial game for ISU? If anything, that is the single most important game on
ISU’s schedule. Another game that I had a problem with is listing Tech as a
straight out loss. That game is at Trice, at a time of year when McCarney’s
teams always thrive. Iowa State can and will win at least one of
those two games.
I agree that the last three games
on the schedule are crucial, but I would have put a W beside Kansas.
The Toledo game is a lot like the KU game, but putting that
game as a maybe for Iowa State shows nothing but disrespect. I’ve
said since the schedule came out that Toledo is going to be a scary game, but you
have to expect ISU to be a favorite in that game by at least a touchdown.
Here is how I would rank the games
individually.
Toledo – W
UNLV – W
@Iowa –
L
@Texas –
L
UNI – W
Nebraska –
Crucial
@Oklahoma –
L
Texas Tech –
Crucial
@KSU – W
Kansas – W
@Colorado – Crucial
Missouri –
Crucial
Athlons has Iowa State going 3-5-4. I have Iowa State going 4-3-4. I will give my official
predictions without the maybes in a future column; these are just in comparison
to Athlons.
Other
Notes
-
Athlons did a cool feature
breaking down the 2001 recruiting class and they discuss how the players have
done. Blake Larsen is mentioned. I laughed.
-
Dan McCarney is listed as one of
the top five underrated coaches in the country.
-
The Big 12 is ranked as the
2nd toughest conference behind the SEC.
o
If
Oklahoma is a national title contender and
Nebraska can
step up and be a top 10 team in the North, this will hold true. If those things
don’t happen, I put the Big Ten at number two and the Big 12 at number three.
-
Washington was listed as a program on the
decline. That’s got to be a joke. Ty Willingham takes over a program in the
dumps and after one year you shatter his ability as a coach? Give me a break.
Give Ty a chance out west, he’ll turn things around.
-
I love the sideline section in
these magazines. You all should know why. There’s nothing like mixing football
and semi-hot cheerleaders from Fresno State.
In
Conclusion…
I was happy with this year’s
issue, for the most part. I encourage you all to pick one up and see what you
think. I don’t know about you all, but September can’t come soon enough.
BRING ON TOLEDO!